Recent studies have demonstrated the value of ancillary techniques, including p57 immunohistochemistry and short tandem repeat genotyping, for distinguishing hydatidiform moles (HM) from nonmolar specimens and for subtyping HMs as complete hydatidiform moles (CHM) and partial hydatidiform moles (PHM).
To our knowledge, this is the first description of a tetraploid PHM confirmed to be triandric by STR analysis, and the first description of p57 immunostaining in a confirmed triandric tetraploid PHM.
Correct classification of all cases combined ranged from 51% to 75% by morphology and 70% to 80% with p57, with statistically significantly better performance of faculty only in round 2 (P-values of 0.69, <0.01, and 0.15 for rounds 1 to 3, respectively). p57 immunostaining significantly improved recognition of CHMs (P<0.01) and had high reproducibility (κ=0.93 to 0.96) but had no impact on distinction of PHMs and NMs.
Even with morphologic assessment by gynecologic pathologists and p57 immunohistochemistry, 20% to 30% of cases will be misclassified, and, in particular, distinction of PHMs and NMs will remain problematic.
In 9 of 10 cases with a discordant diagnosis (negative immunostaining in 8 cases morphologically diagnosed as PHM and one case diagnosed as HA), microsatellite DNA genotyping analysis agreed with the results of p57(KIP2) staining, confirming the diagnosis of CHM in these cases.
Although p57 immunostaining alone can identify CHMs, which lack p57 expression because of the lack of maternal DNA, this analysis cannot distinguish PHMs from nonmolar specimens as both express p57 because of the presence of maternal DNA.
We report a unique HM characterized by morphologic features suggesting an early CHM, including lack of p57 expression by immunohistochemistry, but with genetic features more in keeping with a PHM.
In this study, a retrospectively collected set of morphologically typical CHMs (n = 8), PHMs (n = 10), and NMs (n = 12) was subjected to an analytic validation study of both short tandem repeat genotyping and p57 immunohistochemistry.
Specimens with morphologic features suggestive of CHM yet retaining p57 expression should be subjected to molecular genotyping to establish a definitive diagnosis because misclassification as PHM underestimates the risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease.
Because CM lacks a maternal genome, p57(KIP2) immunostaining is correspondingly absent, whereas hydropic abortuses and partial mole show positive staining.
Complementary use of ploidy analysis and p57KIP2 status can now help to distinguish a diploid hydropic miscarriage (p57KIP2-positive), diploid complete mole (p57KIP2-negative) and triploid partial mole (p57KIP2-positive).
Using a monoclonal antibody on paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissue sections, the authors evaluated p57KIP2 expression in normal placenta and in 149 gestations including 59 complete hydatidiform moles, 39 PHMs, and 51 spontaneous losses with hydropic changes. p57KIP2 was strongly expressed in cytotrophoblast and villous mesenchyme in normal placenta, all cases of partial hydatidiform moles (39 of 39) and all spontaneous losses with hydropic changes (51 of 51).