Alterations of the p53/MDM2 pathway are frequent in OS and usually represent mutually exclusive tumorigenic events. p53 does not appear to be a major determinant of proliferative rate in OS.
Two follicular lymphomas, three leukaemias, both hepatocellular carcinomas, and the osteosarcoma sample showed transcription of the activated MDM2 gene.
The different patterns of gene amplification and overexpression of CDK4, SAS and MDM2 in parosteal and intramedullary osteosarcomas may help explain the disparity in the biological behaviour of these two types of osteosarcoma.
Our results revealed an inactive form of p53 sporadically seen in the samples, a total loss of Rb protein expression, an increased expression of Cdk4, MDM2, c-fos, and c-myc proteins which literature currently reports being the principal alterations found in osteosarcoma.
We found that adenovirus-wt p53 (Ad-wt p53) induces significant apoptosis in HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells expressing low levels of Mdm2, but fails to induce apoptosis in SJSA osteosarcoma cells expressing high levels of Mdm2.
The study provides evidence supporting the association of MDM2 SNP309 with high-grade osteosarcoma risk in females and shows that TP53 Arg72Pro has a prognostic value for overall survival and EFS in osteosarcoma patients.
We found that the HDMX-S/HDMX-FL ratio associated with common somatic genetic lesions connected with p53 inhibition, such as p53 mutation and HDM2 overexpression in osteosarcoma cell lines.
On the other hand, late events such as the loss of RB1 and gain of MDM2, crucial regulators of cell cycle, appear to be related to the final mechanisms contributing to the metastatic establishment of osteosarcoma.
Results from this study suggest that MDM2 genetic variants are potentially related to OS susceptibility in Chinese Han population, and might be used as molecular markers for assessing OS susceptibility.
Results from this study indicated that the allele-A and genotype-AA of MDM2 c.346G>A genetic variant could be an increased risk factor for the susceptibility to osteosarcoma and might be used as a potential molecular marker for evaluating the risk of osteosarcoma.
Therefore, when compared with low-grade central and parosteal osteosarcomas, MDM2 and CDK4 markers cannot be used diagnostically to differentiate this subtype of osteosarcoma.
Using the SJSA-1 osteosarcoma cell line which harbors an amplified MDM2 gene and wild-type p53, we have investigated the acquired resistance mechanisms both in vitro and in vivo to SAR405838.
Five fibroblastic high-grade osteosarcoma subtypes showed MDM2 amplification, including 2 with a microscopic appearance of high-grade osteosarcoma with part low-grade osteosarcoma (differentiated/dedifferentiated osteosarcoma) and MDM2 overexpression.
In conclusion, the present meta-analysis indicates that MDM2rs1690916 and rs2279744cannot be considered as genetic risk factors for OS susceptibility in the different populations.