Tumors were classified into molecular subtypes: luminal A (ER-positive and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) -negative, proliferation marker Ki-67 < 20 and low grade (I)) and luminal B (ER-positive and/or PR-positive, HER2-positive or HER2-negative with high Ki-67 ≥ 20 and higher grade (II or III)).
Further analysis showed that OS, RFS, and DFS were similar between ILC and IDC patients in the subgroups of luminal A and triple-negative BC with HER2 negativity but were worse in ILC patients than those in IDC patients in the subgroups of luminal B and HER2 overexpression with positive HER2 expression.
Significant differences were observed in miRNAs associated with pCR between the luminal B-like (HER2-positive) and HER2-positive (nonluminal) subtypes, which were further classified according to their estrogen receptor (ER) status.
Here, we presented a heavy pretreated and harbored HER2V777L mutation de novo stage IV Luminal B (HER2 unamplified) breast cancer patient who achieved an unexpected good response to trastuzumab combined with vinorelbine therapy.
Data from pathology reports of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancers with Ki67 < 14% (luminal-A; n = 128) and Ki67 ≥ 14% (luminal-B; n = 100) were entered into the automatic recurrence score (RS) calculator accessible at the University of Pittsburgh Department of Pathology website.
Alteration of p16 was the highest in the luminal B and HER-2 groups, and pRB expression rate was the highest in the HER-2 group and lowest in the luminal A group.
Molecular subtypes were defined as luminal A (LA), luminal B (LB)-HER2(-), LB-HER2(+), HER2, and triple-negative (TN) based on the 2013 St. Gallen Consensus criteria.
The subsequent sensitivity analysis using the systemically untreated patients confirmed that higher mRNA expression of CCR3 was a robust prognostic factor for luminal-A (P=0.0025) and luminal-B (P=0.088), but not for HER2-enriched (P=0.21) and TNBC (P=0.86).
Analysis of human breast cancer transcriptome databases showed a strong association between IL-17 gene expression and poor outcome in lymph node positive, estrogen receptor negative or luminal B subtypes suggesting potential therapeutic approaches.
The luminal A subtype accounted for 49.7% of all cases, the HER2-positive subtype for 27.9%, and only 10.4% and 12.0% represented the luminal B and basal-like subtypes, respectively.
Further survival analysis indicated that this SNP was significant in the luminal-B, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) patients using the recessive model but that it was not significant in the luminal-A patients.
Of the 205 tumors, 113 (55%) were classified as Luminal A, 34 (17%) as Luminal B, 32 (15%) as TN, 8 (4%) as ERBB2, 10 (5%) as Luminal A-HER2 Hybrid, and 8 (4%) as Luminal B-HER2 Hybrid.
Breast carcinomas (n=103) identified between 2001 and 2010 from patients seen at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were categorized into luminal A (n=18), luminal B (n=28), HER-2-positive (n=20) and triple-negative carcinomas (n=37) based on tumor characteristics.
In particular, almost all tumors identified as having an intrinsic subtype of basal-like, HER2-positive and estrogen-receptor-negative, or luminal B (associated with a poor prognosis) were also classified as having a poor 70-gene profile, activated wound response, and high recurrence score.
A cohort of 26,767 breast cancer patients were divided in four groups: luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-), luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+ HER2+), HER2+ (ER-, PR-, HER2+), and triple-negative (ER-, PR-, HER2-).
We identified the following subtypes of breast cancer: Luminal A (ER-positive, FR-positive, HER-2-negative), Luminal B (ER-positive, FR-positive, HER-2-positive), HER-2 overexpression (ER-negative, FR-negative, HER-2-positive), and triple-negative breast cancer (ER-negative, FR-negative, HER-2-negative).
However, PEH regimen achieved higher pCR in luminal-B (HER2-poitive) subgroup (55.0% vs. 24.0%; p = 0.033), but not in ERBB2+ subgroup (42.9% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.355).
The CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment shifted ER+/HER2- models from a high risk (luminal B) to a low risk (luminal A) molecular-phenotype using established gene expression panels.
According to the immunohistochemical results, 35.3 % of the study cases were considered as Luminal B (LumB: either being higly proliferative or co-expressing HER2) and 33.3 % as triple negative breast carcinomas (TNBC).