It is often recommended that women who carry a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene have their ovaries and fallopian tubes removed to reduce their risk of gynecologic cancer.
While protection against BRCA1-associated breast cancer (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.22) and BRCA2-associated gynecologic cancer (HR = 0.00; 95% CI, not estimable) was suggested, neither effect reached statistical significance.
We review the options for gynecologic cancer risk reduction in women with an inherited mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes associated with Lynch/HNPCC syndrome.
Data concerning the efficacy of bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy for reducing the risk of gynecologic cancer in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are limited.
To characterize the involvement of the BRCA1 and TP53 tumor suppressor genes and of the KRAS2 protooncogene in gynecologic cancer, mutation analysis of these genes was conducted in pelvic tumors of 85 patients that included 49 epithelial ovarian carcinoma cases.
It is often recommended that women who carry a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene have their ovaries and fallopian tubes removed to reduce their risk of gynecologic cancer.
While protection against BRCA1-associated breast cancer (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.22) and BRCA2-associated gynecologic cancer (HR = 0.00; 95% CI, not estimable) was suggested, neither effect reached statistical significance.
We review the options for gynecologic cancer risk reduction in women with an inherited mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes associated with Lynch/HNPCC syndrome.
Data concerning the efficacy of bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy for reducing the risk of gynecologic cancer in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are limited.
Moreover, the combination of AZD1775 with olaparib or gemcitabine is synergistic in cells with mutant p53 and constitutes a new approach that should be considered in the treatment of advanced and recurrent gynecologic cancer.
In summary, we demonstrate for the first time that loss of ARID1A leads to accumulation of ROS and suggest that elesclomol may be used to target ARID1A-mutant gynecologic cancer cells.
The switch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) subunit ARID1A (AT-rich interactive domain 1A gene) has been recently postulated as a novel tumor suppressor of gynecologic cancer and one of the driver genes in endometrial carcinogenesis.
There have been no case reports of the risk of serious adverse events associated with the administration of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in patients with gynecologic cancer who are compound heterozygous for UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28.
Here, we investigated the prevalence of three different variants of UGT1A1 (UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*27 and UGT1A1*28) and their relationships with irinotecan-induced adverse events in patients with gynecologic cancer, who are treated with lower doses of irinotecan than patients with other types of solid tumors.
Although ARID1A mutations and their expression have been studied in gynecologic cancer, the expression pattern of ARID1A has not been investigated in ovarian atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors.
Although mithramycin activated p53 and suppressed the growth of human gynecologic cancer cell xenografts in mice, this was accompanied with a secondary up-regulation of MDM2.
To investigate the effects of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) *28, *6 and *27 in patients with gynecologic cancer who received chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin.
Postmenopausal women who had estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent ovarian cancer and disease measurable by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or GCIG (Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup) CA-125 criteria were eligible.
We assessed concordance between CA-125-defined and RECIST-defined PD using data from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) randomized phase III AURELIA trial in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).
The overall objective response rate (ORR) to post-olaparib chemotherapy was 36% (24 of 67 patients) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and 45% (35 of 78) by RECIST and/or Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) CA125 criteria with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 17 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI), 13-21] and 34 weeks (95% CI, 26-42), respectively.
Our results showed a significant association between HOTAIRrs920778 polymorphism and increased cancer risk under all five genetic models, as well as in Asians subgroup analysis based on ethnicity, digestive and gynecologic cancer group based on cancer type.