Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
ASCO/CAP 2018 breast cancer HER2 testing guidelines: summary of pertinent recommendations for practice in Australia.
|
31076089 |
2019 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
A total of 592 primary invasive BC cases from before and after the publication of the updated ASCO/CAP guideline were evaluated for HER2 amplification by silver ISH according to the 2013 and 2018 guidelines.
|
30953146 |
2019 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
The differences of clinicopathologic characteristics among subgroups of reclassified HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) according to the ASCO/CAP 2018 breast cancer HER2 testing guidelines.
|
31732618 |
2019 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
Comparative analysis of the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline criterion for HER2 testing of breast cancer.
|
28764718 |
2017 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
Assessment of dual-probe Her-2 fluorescent in situ hybridization in breast cancer by the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines produces more equivocal results than that by the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines.
|
27455837 |
2016 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
|
27180259 |
2016 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
Application of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and the SISH technique for HER2 testing of breast cancer selects more patients for anti-HER2 treatment.
|
26754674 |
2016 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
Accuracy and Reproducibility of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Immunohistochemistry: A Quality Control Study in Tuscany Evaluating the Impact of Updated 2013 ASCO/CAP Recommendations.
|
25367072 |
2015 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
|
26473483 |
2015 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
In turn, performing FISH and evaluating samples using the 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria means that more patients with breast cancer may be appropriate for targeted treatment with trastuzumab, potentially improving their outcome.
|
25818873 |
2015 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
Each case was scored according to the most recent 2013, as well as the 2007, ASCO/CAP scoring guidelines for breast carcinoma.
|
24698965 |
2014 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
Our results from a large series of Chinese patients with breast cancer support that the ASCO/CAP 30% criterion may offer better results for assessing HER2 status.
|
19864236 |
2009 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
Chromogenic in situ hybridization is a reliable method for detecting HER2 gene status in breast cancer: a multicenter study using conventional scoring criteria and the new ASCO/CAP recommendations.
|
19289584 |
2009 |
Breast Carcinoma
|
0.100 |
Biomarker
|
disease |
BEFREE |
The routine assessment of HER2/neu amplification using the ASCO/CAP criteria on whole tissue sections is not significantly confounded by intratumoral heterogeneity in breast cancer with high-grade amplification; however, genetic heterogeneity exists in a subset of breast carcinomas with low-grade amplification.
|
19369627 |
2009 |